The inability of Delta serum to protect against Beta/B.1.621 virus indicates that, as SAGE predicted, sufficient antigenic drift has occurred since the beginning of the pandemic such that only a bivalent vaccine can provide protection today.
This is
not surprising when considering that the two strains took qualitatively
different paths towards immune evasion. Delta increased the distance
between two beta sheets in the RBD by 1.5 angstroms, making the energy
required for antibodies to inactivate the virus greater. Beta and
B.1.621 directly modified their epitopes and relied on electrostatic,
hydrophobic, or other properties to make the antibodies unable to bind.
We do not know how many other qualitatively different paths there are
out there, but it's safe to assume, "a lot."
This
means we can't just amp up the immunogenicity of the vaccine to
compensate for the evolution of the virus. It must be bivalent as of
today. We will try to find a new target beyond S, which is implausible
given the antibody profiles of convalescents, but possible.
However,
given today's global case loads and Delta's higher replication rate,
the number of strains in circulation doubles over once every month, by a
back of the envelope calculation, ignoring any changes to nsp12 and
nsp14. Of course, an increasingly large number of strains is going
extinct at the same time, but the rate at which new, successful strains
emerge will only increase from here unless we can get R below 1.
You
will observe that we were not successful in vaccinating enough of the
world's population to prevent the emergence of Beta nor Delta. Frankly,
we weren't even close. The last mile is the hardest part, as our own
efforts domestically clearly demonstrated. While I anticipate we will
improve our distribution networks and our cap and fill capacity, there
is virtually no chance of us developing new polyvalent vaccines and
administering them quickly enough to catch up to SARS-CoV-2's antigenic
drift.
The severity of COVID-19 will increase.
I say this because each successive dominant strain of SARS-CoV-2 has
been more deadly than its predecessor, strongly indicating that
increased virulence is associated with improved transmission at this
level. Other viruses in its clade are quite deadly(see: MERS). I would
expect to end up, in vaccinated people, somewhere between Delta in
unvaccinated people and SARS-CoV-1, with unvaccinated people getting hit
with severe shrapnel in the evolutionary tussle.
Whether
virulence increases relatively more in vaccinated or unvaccinated
people is unclear, though it's likely to be vaccinated just because there's more of them; there will be more forcing pressures on the adaptive
immune system, but there are peptides and strategies encoded by the
accessory proteins in the ORFs and subunits of S that target both
compartments. There are also antibody-dependent enhancement and
immunological imprinting, the former of which has been widely
demonstrated in other betacoronaviruses and the latter of which we have
largely studiously ignored through our roll-out. It all depends on what
benefits the virus' transmission the most.
I
believe we will not suppress the virus through vaccination. We must develop effective pharmacological
treatments, which do not create perpetual immune escape forcings in
serial transmission, but which are years off and may do little to ward
off long COVID.
Long COVID will be the most
impactful aspect of the pandemic in the long term, as hundreds of
millions of people have gone from productive members of society to
dependents. We will face labor shortages for years in all manner of
disciplines, since fatigue and brain fog are both prominent symptoms.
Comments
Post a Comment